Grace Pearce, leader of the peace party, has taken the labour to kindly critique the Originals. The opinion may be somewhat biased and therefore ganstijden shall not affiliate itself with the article below. The Presidency shall take no responsibility within the content of the article. The Originals are allowed to create an opposition to this, judging by the fact that they have the evidence to do so. Dunker.
It has been found that the Original party, lead by G.Simran, is corrupt, and dishonest with ‘the people’.
The Original party has no political advantage or policies, the only thing they have going for them is the ‘fact’ that they care for and listen to the people. However, this can easily be proved wrong, as the people of Humanytaria have voted for the Peace Party, and if the people wanted the Originals, that is what they would have voted for. The Originals are very angry with this democracy, and demand corruption within Humanytaria to win the elections. They say they listen to the people, but they want to deny the people so that they can listen to them. Explain how this makes sense. You can’t, it doesn’t.
They believe the elections were corrupt, due to the fact that a member of the Peace Party received more than one voting card to represent his family, all of which had signed up to be a member of Humanytaria. To the Originals, this was corruption. However, the fact that a member of the Original party voted twice (of course, one was not counted due to the strict one-vote-only law passed earlier this year) is not corruption. One of the Original members have even admitted ‘if the election had been corrupted for the Originals favour, we wouldn’t be so bothered.’ This quote shows they do not care about the moral disruption behind corruption, but only about the fact that they lost. The president has admitted that, ‘although some voters were given more than card due to the fact that they had family members to represent, the elections were recorded fairly and honestly.’. It has been confirmed that the Peace Party has won the elections, and this shall not change until the next elections in February.
The Originals, whom have admitted to be in favour of supporting tyrannical exercises, wish to express the opinion of the few rather than the many. How do we know this, you may ask? Well, what the Originals do not tell you is the fact that ‘listening to the people’ is not the same as acting upon what the people believe in. Ask yourself, what has the Originals party done on behalf of you? Unless you are an affiliate with the party, the answer is most definitely nothing. In other words, they not only listen to just those who enjoy their political preference, but in addition to this, they only act upon what they believe. In more specific detail, unless your name is G.Johal, Mia Robins or Faiza Gull, your view does not matter to this ‘socialist-trade unionist’ party.
G.Simran, leader of the Originals, has confessed that she has named her party after a popular television programme, ironically named the Originals, rather than a nationalistic and progressive ‘Originals’ you might have interpreted it to be. This is most possibly due to a lack of political preference from the leader.
furthermore, it should become rather obvious to one that the logo of the party is completely irrelevant to what the party stands for. Unlike the Peace Party (a rose and fist) and the conservationals (a conservative-like tree), they seem to have no taste in a logo to represent what they stand for.
Still, with a manifesto with nothing political but:
The Socialist Originals are a Left-Libertarian party founded in late May. The party is the largest and most influential, they are most commonly known for listening to the people. They have talented architects who are designing areas for the future development.
It only takes a small amount of thinking to consume the factor that the Originals are lying ‘muppets’. On the topic of manifestos and promises, lets take a look at a few promises made by members of the party and see if they were compleated, correctly.
- I promise to give free cookies out to the people
- I promise to create a ministry of cookies
- I promise to create a cookie invention
Not only are these promises immature and unprofessional, only one of the three promises were compleated in the specified timing.
- I promise to offer housing to the refugees.
- I promise to create a Originals memorial.
- I promise to create more jobs via housing.
This appears to be worse than the previous. None of the three promises were fulfilled. You know why? Simply because of the age of our country and the laziness of the party TO FIGURE THIS OUT. Our country is still fresh and developing, we have yet to matured in the micronational world. We don’t have the funds to achieve any of these goals, not until another 5 years at the minimum.
Yes, I appreciate the fact that geese immigration may seem slightly senseless. But geese, unlike humans, are currently habituating the area.